![]() ![]() I’ve combined all three results together to get a more overall picture of performance. Rather than retest the same thing again in AS SSD, I really like the copy benchmark in AS SSD which copies three different file types and times them. As for the write performance, well they did manage to improve things here going from 2800MB/s up to 3017MB/s, a nice jump on what was already good performance. ![]() That is to be expected though considering they both use the same controller and NAND with firmware updates being the main source of improvements. Both are normal, but go to show you that there is some variation in testing as well as in drives themselves and the gap between last year and this year's drives is very close. The results for the 2018 model are a little higher than they advertised and at 3435MB/s the SN750 is just a touch below the 3475 that they estimated. The read results put the SN750 basically tied with last years model. To start off the testing I went with what everyone loves to see, sequential read and write performance. I’ve also got a copy of the CrystalDiskInfo below to document the firmware version that I tested with. For example on read speeds, the 500GB and 1TB both have the same read speed listed (in sequential performance not random), but the 1TB has a faster write speed and both are faster than the 250GB and 2TB models. Keep in mind that the capacity does play a role in the speeds. Then on top of that, there are all of those same capacities that will be available with a heatsink as well once that comes out, right now they just have that listed as Spring. Today for launch the 2TB model is not available, it is estimated to be coming out in February. The SN750 is going to be available in 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB. Before jumping into testing, I did want to address the different models of the WD Black SN750 that are available.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |